Hi,

I have used llblgen for a while now but every time I had to generate code, it was in C#.

Now I have a project where the code generated is in vb.net. I noticed that the classes created are not partial classes? Why is this? Am I missing an option? When I regenerate in C#, the classes are generated as partial.

Any help would be appreciated. I prefer putting custom code in another file int he of the #Custom code section inside the class file

-Miguel Martorell

Partial keyword is not taken into account in VB.Net templates. I think it's that way because that is not mandatory, I mean you can create one partial class even if the generated one is not signed as Partial.

I will confirm if this is the reason. (Edit): Copied from the docs

Partial classes In .NET 2.0, partial classes are introduced and LLBLGen Pro generates all classes for .NET 2.0 as partial classes. For VB.NET this doesn't make a difference as any class can be extended by another code file with a partial class definition with the same name, though in C#, all classes are generated as partial classes. ...

Awesome! Thanks! Got to learn something new, this would be my first project in VB where I use LLBLGEN.

Didn't know this about partial classes in VB.

Have a great day.

You're welcome