Hi,

I'm migrating from 2.6 to 3.0. When you have to tables A en B that have a 1:n relation, with the code generated bij 2.6 one could use the following:

AEntity z = new AEntity(123).

if (z.B.Count > 0) .....

I.e. the reference to the related entities uses the singular name of B.

When I generate the code under 3.0 accessing B using the singular name is not possible. You have to code

if (z.Bs.Count > 0) .....

Is this the new standard naming convention? Can it be changed, e.g. in the project propertie?

Best regards,

Jan

Please check this doumentation link: How to disable name singularization

But in your case you should pick "NameSingularToPluralConversion" Designer Event.

In the default situation both plural to singular and singular to plural are active. Is this the standard LLBLGen promotes?

I like to stick to default settings as mucht as possible.

Yes these are the defaults.

In v3.0, pluralization/singularization is on by default. In v2.6 you had to enable it.

As mentioned, I prefer working with default settings. Therefor I never changed anything in the settings except for removing prefixes.

I allways give my tables singular names. Using plural in references to related items is something I normally would not do. In accessing individual fields, you have to specify the index of the entry you want. I prefer entity.RelatedField(i) above entity.RelatedFields(i). However, my preference for using defaults overules this.

You can change the pluralization in references, by changing the patterns. Honestly, the defaults given are just examples in this case, you really should tweak them to make them fit how you want to work, they're there for that